In the world of football, there have been many memorable moments and debates that have taken place over the years. One such debate is the one surrounding the Referee Decision Makers (RDM) in Liverpool's history.

The RDMs were responsible for making decisions on various aspects of the game, including penalties, red cards, and yellow cards. In Liverpool's case, this decision-making process has been a subject of much debate, with some fans and players believing that certain officials had influenced the outcome of matches.

One of the most famous instances of controversy involved John Toshack, who was the manager of Liverpool when he was sent off during a match against West Ham United in 1988. Toshack claimed that he had been fouled by a West Ham player, but the referee did not show him any indication of a foul. As a result, Toshack was sent off and Liverpool went on to lose the match 2-0.

This incident sparked a debate about whether or not the referee should be given more power to make decisions. Some fans argued that the referee should be given more authority to ensure fairness in the game, while others believed that the referees should be held accountable if they made mistakes.

Another example of controversy surrounding the RDMs occurred during the 2014/15 season, when a controversial penalty decision led to a replay of the match. The referee awarded a penalty to Liverpool, but it was later overturned after it was discovered that the goal had been scored from outside the box. This incident highlighted the need for a clear and consistent system of refereeing, as well as the importance of having officials who can make fair and unbiased decisions.

Overall, the debate surrounding the RDMs in Liverpool's history highlights the importance of having a fair and impartial system of refereeing. While there may be some instances where officials make mistakes, it is important that these mistakes are not punished unfairly and that the game remains fair and entertaining for all involved.